Bug#681691: Having same error after updating kernel
Version: 1.58
Hello,
I never had this error before using the kernel from wheezy-backports, but now apt said that there are these updates available:
linux-compiler-gcc-4.6-x86
linux-headers-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64
linux-headers-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-common
linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64
I installed them and it called update-grub as expected. Before the
updates update-grub correctly detected all 4 operating systems
on my computer and I could start them all without problems. But now I
experienced just the same error and it only detected the current
running OS, Debian Wheezy, and Windows 8. After mounting the other two partitions manually everything works.
The versions that the packages were updated to:
# aptitude versions linux-compiler-gcc-4.6-x86
linux-headers-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 linux-headers-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-common
linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64
Paket linux-compiler-gcc-4.6-x86:
i A 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1 wheezy-backports 800
Paket linux-compiler-gcc-4.6-x86:i386:
p 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1 wheezy-backports 800
Paket linux-headers-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64:
i 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1 wheezy-backports 800
Paket linux-headers-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64:i386:
p 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1 wheezy-backports 800
Paket linux-headers-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-common:
i A 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1 wheezy-backports 800
Paket linux-headers-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-common:i386:
p 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1 wheezy-backports 800
Paket linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64:
i A 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1 wheezy-backports 800
Paket linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-dbg:
p 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1 wheezy-backports 800
Paket linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64:i386:
p 3.16.7-ckt4-3~bpo70+1 wheezy-backports 800
The versions of the responsible packages:
# aptitude versions grub2-common os-prober
Paket grub2-common:
i A 1.99-27+deb7u2 stable 900
p A 2.02~beta2-21 unstable 10
Paket grub2-common:i386:
p 1.99-27+deb7u2 stable 900
p 2.02~beta2-21 unstable 10
Paket os-prober:
i A 1.58 stable 900
p A 1.65 unstable 10
Paket os-prober:i386:
p 1.58 stable 900
p 1.65 unstable 10
Reply to: