[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#756996: marked as done (mentions of 2.6 kernel in the d-i manual)



Your message dated Tue, 5 Aug 2014 23:23:05 +0200
with message-id <20140805232305.55e11b9f7efb9a810c685f6a@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#756996: mentions of 2.6 kernel in the d-i manual
has caused the Debian Bug report #756996,
regarding mentions of 2.6 kernel in the d-i manual
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
756996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-guide
Tags: patch


Hi,

in the d-i manual, I have noticed there are some mentions of 
2.6 kernel being the default kernel series in Debian.

I have prepared a patch to fix that (attached).

Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series
shipped with the respective release.
Would it be worse to add such an entity? 
Is 3.14 kernel for Jessie correct?

Comments?


Holger



-- 
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under the new
	D E B I A N   L I N U X   7 . 0   W H E E Z Y !

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================
Index: build/entities/common.ent
===================================================================
--- build/entities/common.ent	(Revision 69218)
+++ build/entities/common.ent	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -156,6 +156,10 @@
      http://lists.debian.org/completeindex.html) -->
 <!ENTITY num-of-debian-maillists "260">
 
+<!-- value of which linux kernel series is the default linux kernel -->
+<!-- shipped with the current release -->
+<!ENTITY linuxkernelseries-ver "3.14">
+
 <!-- version of X11 shipping with the current release -->
 <!ENTITY x11ver "7.7">
 
Index: en/appendix/files.xml
===================================================================
--- en/appendix/files.xml	(Revision 69218)
+++ en/appendix/files.xml	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -202,7 +202,8 @@
 <para>
 
 A standard installation for the amd64 architecture, including all standard
-packages and using the default 2.6 kernel, takes up &std-system-size;MB of disk space.
+packages and using the default &linuxkernelseries-ver; kernel, takes up to
+&std-system-size;MB of disk space.
 A minimal base installation, without the <quote>Standard system</quote>
 task selected, will take &base-system-size;MB.
 
Index: en/install-methods/tftp/rarp.xml
===================================================================
--- en/install-methods/tftp/rarp.xml	(Revision 69218)
+++ en/install-methods/tftp/rarp.xml	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 </para><para>
 
-On a RARP server system using a Linux 2.4 or 2.6 kernel, or Solaris/SunOS,
+On a RARP server system using a Linux 2.4, 2.6 or 3.x kernel, or Solaris/SunOS,
 you use the <command>rarpd</command> program.
 You need to ensure that the Ethernet hardware address for the client is
 listed in the <quote>ethers</quote> database (either in the
Index: en/partitioning/tree.xml
===================================================================
--- en/partitioning/tree.xml	(Revision 69218)
+++ en/partitioning/tree.xml	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
   <entry>Mount point for mounting a file system temporarily</entry>
 </row><row>
   <entry><filename>proc</filename></entry>
-  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4 and 2.6 kernels)</entry>
+  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4, 2.6 and 3.x kernels)</entry>
 </row><row>
   <entry><filename>root</filename></entry>
   <entry>Home directory for the root user</entry>
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
   <entry>Essential system binaries</entry>
 </row><row>
   <entry><filename>sys</filename></entry>
-  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 kernels)</entry>
+  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 and 3.x kernels)</entry>
 </row><row>
   <entry><filename>tmp</filename></entry>
   <entry>Temporary files</entry>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 12:14 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- en/partitioning/tree.xml	(Revision 69218)
> > > > +++ en/partitioning/tree.xml	(Arbeitskopie)
> > > > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
> > > >    <entry>Mount point for mounting a file system temporarily</entry>
> > > >  </row><row>
> > > >    <entry><filename>proc</filename></entry>
> > > > -  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4 and 2.6 kernels)</entry>
> > > > +  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4, 2.6 and 3.x kernels)</entry>
> > > 
> > > I wouldn't even mention the version: I've seen /proc for as long as I
> > > can remember.
> > 
> > I agree.
> > 
> > > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
> > > >    <entry>Essential system binaries</entry>
> > > >  </row><row>
> > > >    <entry><filename>sys</filename></entry>
> > > > -  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 kernels)</entry>
> > > > +  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 and 3.x kernels)</entry>
> > > 
> > > I'd rather patch into "Linux 2.6 and further", I don't think /sys is to
> > > go away.
> > 
> > I agree.
> > 
> > Ben.
> 
> kfreebsd came to my mind.
> We have d-i manual for kfreebsd versions, too.
> And /proc + /sys also exists on a kfreebsd system.
> Maybe drop all the information within the brackets?


Ok, since noone objected, I have committed this:


Index: install-methods/tftp/rarp.xml
===================================================================
--- install-methods/tftp/rarp.xml	(Revision 69219)
+++ install-methods/tftp/rarp.xml	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 </para><para>
 
-On a RARP server system using a Linux 2.4 or 2.6 kernel, or Solaris/SunOS,
+On a RARP server system using a Linux kernel or Solaris/SunOS,
 you use the <command>rarpd</command> program.
 You need to ensure that the Ethernet hardware address for the client is
 listed in the <quote>ethers</quote> database (either in the
Index: partitioning/tree.xml
===================================================================
--- partitioning/tree.xml	(Revision 69219)
+++ partitioning/tree.xml	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
   <entry>Mount point for mounting a file system temporarily</entry>
 </row><row>
   <entry><filename>proc</filename></entry>
-  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4 and 2.6 kernels)</entry>
+  <entry>Virtual directory for system information</entry>
 </row><row>
   <entry><filename>root</filename></entry>
   <entry>Home directory for the root user</entry>
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
   <entry>Essential system binaries</entry>
 </row><row>
   <entry><filename>sys</filename></entry>
-  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 kernels)</entry>
+  <entry>Virtual directory for system information</entry>
 </row><row>
   <entry><filename>tmp</filename></entry>
   <entry>Temporary files</entry>
Index: appendix/files.xml
===================================================================
--- appendix/files.xml	(Revision 69219)
+++ appendix/files.xml	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@
 <para>
 
 A standard installation for the amd64 architecture, including all standard
-packages and using the default 2.6 kernel, takes up &std-system-size;MB of disk space.
+packages and using the default kernel, takes up &std-system-size;MB of disk space.
 A minimal base installation, without the <quote>Standard system</quote>
 task selected, will take &base-system-size;MB.


-- 
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>

--- End Message ---

Reply to: