Bug#756996: mentions of 2.6 kernel in the d-i manual

[Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>]

Hi,

Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 12:14 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit :
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- en/partitioning/tree.xml	(Revision 69218)
> > > +++ en/partitioning/tree.xml	(Arbeitskopie)
> > > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
> > >    <entry>Mount point for mounting a file system temporarily</entry>
> > >  </row><row>
> > >    <entry><filename>proc</filename></entry>
> > > -  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4 and 2.6 kernels)</entry>
> > > +  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4, 2.6 and 3.x kernels)</entry>
> > 
> > I wouldn't even mention the version: I've seen /proc for as long as I
> > can remember.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
> > >    <entry>Essential system binaries</entry>
> > >  </row><row>
> > >    <entry><filename>sys</filename></entry>
> > > -  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 kernels)</entry>
> > > +  <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 and 3.x kernels)</entry>
> > 
> > I'd rather patch into "Linux 2.6 and further", I don't think /sys is to
> > go away.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> Ben.

kfreebsd came to my mind.
We have d-i manual for kfreebsd versions, too.
And /proc + /sys also exists on a kfreebsd system.
Maybe drop all the information within the brackets?


Holger

-- 
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>