[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#773255: Add TI OMAP5 uEVM board support db



> On Dec 19, 2014, at 10:54, Chen Baozi <baozich@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 02:03, Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 23:28 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
>>>> On Dec 17, 2014, at 23:04, Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 12:18 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
>>>>> Package: flash-kernel
>>>>> Version: 3.28
>>>>> Severity: wishlist
>>>>> Tags: patch
>>>>> 
>>>>> With the patch attached, TI OMAP5 uEVM board is supported.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>>> +Machine: TI OMAP5 uEVM board
>>>>> +Method: generic
>>>>> +U-Boot-Kernel-Address: 0x80008000
>>>>> +U-Boot-Initrd-Address: 0x0
>>>>> +U-Boot-Script-Address: 0x0
>>>>> +U-Boot-Script-Name: bootscr.omap
>>>>> +Boot-Device: /dev/mmcblk1p1
>>>>> +Boot-Kernel-Path: uImage
>>>>> +Boot-Initrd-Path: uInitrd
>>>>> +Boot-Script-Path: boot.scr
>>>>> +Required-Packages: u-boot-tools
>>>> 
>>>> A few questions about u-boot on this platform:
>>>> 
>>>>    * Does it support the bootz command?
>>> 
>>> The default one shipped with the board, which I got last year, seems not.
>>> But I’m now using the latest upstream u-boot, which does support ‘bootz’.


I’ve only booted the system by ‘bootz’ without initrd. If I load the raw
initrd image (rather than ‘uInitrd”), when I use bootz, it would output:

Wrong Ramdisk Image Format
Ramdisk image is corrupt or invalid

This is the reason that I’m still using bootm when initrd is needed.

Baozi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Reply to: