Anton Zinoviev <firstname.lastname@example.org> (2014-11-26): > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 05:45:56PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > > and that… leads me to believe that nobody actually looked at what's in > > git between 1.114 and 1.115; there's a single commit. > > > > Now, trying to rebuild 1.114 and 1.115 from the respective git tags, > > using “debuild -S -i -I”, leads me to the following diff: > > Keyboard/ckbcomp | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > debian/changelog | 8 +++++ > > 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+) > > > > which matches the changes in git. > > > > So it looks to me that both the 1.114 and 1.115 uploads were including > > unwanted files/changes. See the following diffstats, between the > > versions in the archive (fetched through debsnap) and my local builds: > > > > [...] > > > > I'm therefore tempted to upload 1.116 which would match 1.115 without > > the cruft, also known as 1.114 plus the bugfix minus the cruft. > > > > Christian, Anton: please make sure to upload clean(er) packages next time. > > Except for the fontconfig directory in the source package, there are no > other problems in 1.114 or 1.115. The differences between my upload and > the upload of Christian are due to different versions of xkb-data we > have used. Errr, see the diff between the source packages in the archive and the ones actually built from the relevant git tags (the diffstats were provided, which you replaced with [...]). They are very much filled with cruft. Which makes it very hard for people to figure out what changed. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature