Bug#769190: Bug#757941: Bug#769190: busybox-static: DNS resolver is broken again with the last upload

[Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>]

12.11.2014 22:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:17:20PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Should I list them all in the build-deps?  If yes, what's the complete list?

> It should be libc6-dev[linux-any !alpha !ia64] | libc6.1-dev [alpha ia64] | libc0.1-dev (>> 2.19-12~) [kfreebsd-any] | libc0.3 (2.19-12~) [hurd-any]

Please double-check:

Build-Depends:
# glibc static-nss #754813, 2.19..2.19-11, -12 is ok
 libc6-dev (>> 2.19-12~) [linux-any !alpha !ia64] |
 libc6-dev (<< 2.19)     [linux-any !alpha !ia64] |
 libc6.1-dev (>> 2.19-12~) [alpha ia64] |
 libc6.1-dev (<< 2.19)     [alpha ia64] |
 libc0.1-dev (>> 2.19-12~) [kfreebsd-any] |
 libc0.1-dev (<< 2.19)     [kfreebsd-any] |
 libc0.3-dev (>> 2.19-12~) [hurd-any] |
 libc0.3-dev (<< 2.19)     [hurd-any],

Since this is all alternatives, is it really necessary to list the [arch]
names?  I mean, just list of pkgs with versions should be enough I think,
each arch will pick the right name, no?

Thanks,

/mjt