Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (2014-08-26): > Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> (2014-08-26): > > While adding i18n to partman-iscsi, I noticed that it is a sta,ndard > > component of D-I. My understanding of iSCSI devices is that this is > > quite a corner case for installation. Therefore, shouldn't the package > > be "priority: optional". The consequence would be that iSCSI > > partitioning wouldn't be showing up in partman menus in default > > installs.....but only when users of expert mode choose to load to udeb. > > I'm no expert but that looks good to me. OK, I'm going to take that back. Julien pointed out on IRC that iSCSI is much more common than I initially thought, as opposed to multipath or nbd (which indeed are optional), and Colin that hiding iSCSI wouldn't be a huge service to our users. Therefore it looks to me that standard is the proper value. If we want to avoid showing untranslated material in a default install, it might be sufficient to make sure the partman-iscsi/text/configure_iscsi string is translated in all languages first; and translators can keep up with the other strings of this package whenever they have time? I understand extra strings are no fun. But the freeze is still a few weeks away, and l10n-{only,mostly} uploads/migrations are very much possible; remember the bulk of l10n changes I reviewed/approved during the wheezy freeze. ;) Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature