Hi,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 07:32:22PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Now, I think there are several questions to answer:
> 1. What were the reasons for having arch-dependent dhcp clients?
> 2. Are those reasons still valid?
>
> => Maybe think about moving to a single client if possible, at least for
> consistency's sake (and probably maintenance costs).
>
> The answer to the first question is likely answered by looking at some
> git history, and possible links to bug reports. As for the second, we'll
> likely need porter input.
as I guessed from memory, here's one:
commit 75b4faa11bda438e34b5140934f6b812d1a69040
Author: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Date: Thu Mar 3 18:10:31 2011 +0100
Make netcfg depend on isc-dhcp-client-udeb on hurd-any too
for the same reason as kfreebsd: no support for udhcp in busybox.
If this is still true I don't know.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature