Your message dated Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:42:59 +0100 with message-id <20140319214253.GD5789@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#214058: proposal: add optional initrd-images has caused the Debian Bug report #214058, regarding proposal: add optional initrd-images to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 214058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=214058 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: proposal: add optional initrd-images
- From: David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at>
- Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 10:25:47 +0200
- Message-id: <E1A5hjX-0000i9-8l@localhost>
Package: lilo Version: 1:22.5.7.2-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Dear Maintainer! After being bitten twice by forgetting to add an "initrd=" to an image, I have solved that by adding additional, optional images containing the default initrds. Like that: image=/vmlinuz label=Linux read-only image=/vmlinuz label=LinuxRD initrd=/initrd.img read-only optional image=/vmlinuz.old label=LinuxOLD read-only optional image=/vmlinuz.old label=LinuxRDOLD initrd=/initrd.img.old read-only optional Putting these additional images into lilo.conf also obsoletes the initrd question in kernel-package built kernel-images and makes lilo much more robust. For people without initrd those images will be quietly ignored. Thank you for your time and work, David Schmitt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at>, 214058-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Andrés Roldán <aroldan@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#214058: proposal: add optional initrd-images
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:42:59 +0100
- Message-id: <20140319214253.GD5789@mraw.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5329F787.1000509@schmitt.edv-bus.at>
- References: <E1A5hjX-0000i9-8l@localhost> <7dzngfy1es.fsf@void.central.fluidsignal.com> <[🔎] 20140316230128.GA22293@mraw.org> <[🔎] 5329F787.1000509@schmitt.edv-bus.at>
David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at> (2014-03-19): > If nobody on the lilo-installer team can answer this question by > taking a quick look into his/her test setup, then it may be time to > send the code to the attic? I'm going to start with closing this bug report. Apparently lilo is still maintained (at least uploaded), so if people have some more bugs, they might be getting fixed. Thanks for following up. Mraw, KiBi.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---