On 02/06/2013 10:38 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 02/06/2013 12:55 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: >> Is it the intention of the Release Managers not to accept a newer >> version of syslinux into wheezy? [That is, if the CTTE were to decide >> to require some "fix" to d-i, we'd also have to override the RMs?] > > jftr, i never did nor intended to ask for having syslinux 5 in wheezy. > what i care about is having it in unstable (for reasons said earlier). > Well, the d-i development is happening in sid. Therefore, this upload disrupted the development process of syslinux dependent d-i components that have to end up, but are not yet in wheezy. Milan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature