Re: ZFS support in partman-target

[Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>]

Hi.

On 21/05/13 16:36, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [...] I think it would be safer to keep all
> relevant changes into a zol (or any other appropriate name) branch,

I think so too;  I did take a look at this on Github.  I think it would
be more accessible in Debian's repository, but ideally staged in a
branch first.

I noticed for example on Github a commit that was made redundant /
invalidated by the next one.  Also some commits have simultaneously
altered whitespace and code which is hard to follow.  It may be neater
if the useful bits can be more neatly picked out of a branch and merged
into master occasionally (e.g. at per-feature intervals).

I'm glad someone is working on this though, and that we are sharing code
+ repository between kFreeBSD ZFS and ZoL.


Also, what has happened to d-i/partman-zfs.git?  The HEAD shows
debian/changelog with the odd 24.tf.x versions prepended, but since then:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/partman-zfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=780f01b2cc1bb63b8f6f6cbc6a40ed1db03d79ef

that commit showing no trace of them any more, not in the diff or
context... so where did they go?  Seems something got wiped out by a
merge/conflict/rewrite of history...

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
steven@pyro.eu.org