w.d.o/devel/debian-installer links and descriptions (was: w.d.o/devel/debian-installer references daily images but doesn't contain any…)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
[ Please keep me or debian-www CC, I'm not following this list closely ]
Hi,
Le 02/11/2012 06:30, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> David Prévot <taffit@debian.org> (01/11/2012):
>> There was also a commented description paragraph (hidden in the HTML
>> file), I just freed it, it will show up online in a few hours,
>> thanks for your report.
>
> Please revert until it is discussed on -boot.
That has been reverted, but an actual description of the daily images
would be welcome anyway [1]. Here is the current commented one, feel
free to improve it and commit it uncommented:
> If you prefer to use the latest and greatest, either to help us test a future
> release of the installer or because of hardware problems or other issues,
> try one of these *daily built images* which contain the latest
> available version of installer components.
Furthermore, now the businesscard images vanished, would it make sense
to place the “other images” links next to “netinst” ones in the first
line (or would another link make more sense)? It'll keep CD and DVD in
the same raw for the further links, just not sure we want “other images”
to be in the first raw, but as is, it looks weird to have the first line
half empty. Would be nice to have this question answered before Wheezy
get published [2] (yes of course we have way more important stuff to do
beside those nip-ticks, but we'll have way more important stuff to do
than answering those questions when we'll be in the actual rush).
Regards
David
1: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
2: http://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/debian-installer/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=2uYf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: