On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 23:24:52 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > 5) the touchscreen works out of the box, but not on the very external > > zones, so if you should click there (e.g. the sliding bars on the GTK > > d-i or the GNOME3 panel) you should better use the integrated > > mouse. > > Can you please file a bug against the relevant xserver-xorg-input-xxx > driver. > That would rather be the kernel driver. Or just missing calibration. > > 6) I know this is not really a bug, but after the installation the Wi-Fi > > WPA settings were save in /etc/network/interfaces. Given that this > > latter is world-readable, this could pose security risks (if this is > > already documented, please forgive me). > > > > I also found surprising the fact that the Wi-Fi card is not managed > > by Network-Manager because of the above (I know this is a never > > ending issue...). > > Did not know this happens. IMO at least for a desktop (most computers > with wireless are desktops) there should be no wireless configuration be > copied to /etc/network/interfaces. Maybe that's something sorina could > fix. What do others think? > I think we need to fix that for wheezy, yes. > Luca if you agree, can you file a bug report against netcfg. > > > > > 7) some function keys (like the pad ones) do not work as expected and > > are wrongly mapped: > > > > Vol up/down OK > > Menu XF86MenuKB > > UDF F11 > > mouse L/R OK > > ENTER OK > > arrow-left F9 > > arrow-up F1 > > arrow-right F10 > > arrow-down F3 > > > > The above could be caused by the fact that I am using a en_US layout > > for the it_IT hardware keyboard or also by the whole installation > > done with the external USB keyboard plugged in. Moreover, I do not > > really know what some keys (like UDF) are supposed to do. I will > > investigate a bit more later on. > > If this is also present with the italian keyboard mapping it's > definitely a bug. Please file it against the relevant package (probably > xkb-data). > I don't think there's an xkb-data issue here. Then again I don't understand the reported problem, and there's not enough information here. [...] > > While detailed installation-reports are generally very usefull and we > appreciate them, the d-i team currently lacks the resources to process > most of them. If they concern issues in the installed system it's much > more usefull to directly file bugs against the relevant packages. > Otherwise these issues tend to just rot in the BTS as nobody has the > time to process them. > > Just reassigning and cloning this report to the relevant packages does > not work as the report sometimes lacks needed information and it's quite > difficult for maintainers to find the relevant part inside a > installation report. > > I'm therefore closing this report as it does not concern anything in > d-i. > Well I would argue that the netcfg vs network-manager issue concerns d-i, but... Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature