Forwarding this mail so that people involved in accessibility issues can answer. In short: is the Debian graphical installer as accessible as the text installer is? ----- Forwarded message from Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> ----- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:03:54 +0100 From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Subject: Switch to graphical installer by default? X-Mailing-List: <debian-boot@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/166565 X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 28.8803 ) We're discussing this at DebCamp today (again). What are the pros and cons? g-i give us: * more languages support * prettier output? But: what are the other effects? How well does g-i work for blind users? Are all of the normal installer functions fully supported under g-i? It'd be easy to make the switch to g-i if we think it's right to for wheezy, but let's work out if it's the right thing to do. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com Armed with "Valor": "Centurion" represents quality of Discipline, Honor, Integrity and Loyalty. Now you don't have to be a Caesar to concord the digital world while feeling safe and proud. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: [🔎] 20120707190354.GW4092@einval.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20120707190354.GW4092@einval.com ----- End forwarded message ----- --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature