Le mercredi, 27 juin 2012 07.34:20, Christian PERRIER a écrit : > > Thanks for the detailed answer. > > Am I correct concluding that we can safely add > browser-plugin-lightspark to the desktop task? My opinion as maintainer is that is is safe to do so _provided_ lightspark gets more bugs filed; ironically. Due to the nature of both the lightspark project and Youtube (and other flash-relying websites), the combination of both will be broken over time. This brokenness needs to be documented as bugs in the Debian BTS for it to have a chance to be fixed. (CC'ing debian-release@ for opinions on the following) My main concern is that a useful lightspark will need rather frequent updates, even in stable. I think it's better to have a semi-working not-totally-stable free flash player than letting our users rely on Adobe's. Release Team: would a more liberal upgrade policy be acceptable for lightspark ? Cheers, OdyX
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.