[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#673365: marked as done (installation-report: dnet-common looks unnecessary for normal environment)

Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2012 21:49:17 +0200
with message-id <20120521194917.GU7524@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#673365: installation-report: dnet-common looks unnecessary for normal environment
has caused the Debian Bug report #673365,
regarding installation-report: dnet-common looks unnecessary for normal environment
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

673365: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: normal

Boot method: CD
Image version: wheezy alpha1 i386
Date: 2012-05-18

Machine: VirtualBox

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:           [O]
Detect network card:    [O]
Configure network:      [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:    [O]
Install tasks:          [O] but...
Install boot loader:    [O]
Overall install:        [O]


Of course all installations worked well on VirtualBox, but
I noticed the installer (with choosing desktop on tasksel)
asked dnet-common debconf configuration even debconf-level
was high.

Although I'm not sure what introduces dnet-common, setting
DECnet seems unnecessary for modern environment.

Kenshi Muto

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Quoting Steve McIntyre (steve@einval.com):

> >But, for sure, having a default Debian desktop install asking
> >questions about "DECNet node address" is certainly not something we
> >want.
> #655740. I'm about to NMU it to fix this daft behaviour.

I just see you did. So I think we can now close this installation
report as there shouldn't be any weird question about DECnet in
defaults installs once dnprogs reach testing.

(still I wonder what pulls libdnet in desktop installs but that's
another story)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: