Re: Bug#673839: Building an udeb binary
Le 21/05/2012 21:17, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
That means more udebs, more stuff in the d-i image/initramfs. I'm not
sure it's worth the trouble. Quite the contrary, in fact.
It looks to me like a separate build is better as far as d-i is concerned.
How "costy" would those udeb be? Those are small libraries...
Having to rebuild gtk has a cost as well, not only it increases the
build time for it quite a lot, it also means the code build is using
mostly untested codepaths (they are very few users or distributions
trying to not use those xorg libraries)