[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#673839: Building an udeb binary

Sebastien Bacher <seb128@ubuntu.com> (21/05/2012):
> Currently gtk is doing a second build pass with different configure
> option for its udeb flavor because libxrandr, libxcomposite and
> libxdamage don't have udebs. It would be nice if you could add an udeb
> to libxrandr so we could bring gtk into a single pass build

That means more udebs, more stuff in the d-i image/initramfs. I'm not
sure it's worth the trouble. Quite the contrary, in fact.

It looks to me like a separate build is better as far as d-i is concerned.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: