Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Time passed, and a version of tasksel which implements the "real
> package" approach will migrate to testing in the next day or so.
>
> joeyh / -boot - could you confirm that the task overrides {can,should}
> be dropped (and thus the fields removed from the Packages files for
> testing) once the current version of tasksel migrates?
Yes, that's right.
> From the britney point-of-view, I'm looking at dropping most of the
> current tasksel-meta-faux-* generation in favour of a single faux
> package which depends on all of the real task-* packages. This would
> allow us to track co-installability of the tasks.
That sounds about right..
--
see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature