[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#619700: marked as done (Please consider using the build-essential package instead of Build-Essental: yes)

Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2011 17:05:01 +0000
with message-id <E1QNT8H-00059S-4g@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#619700: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.31
has caused the Debian Bug report #619700,
regarding Please consider using the build-essential package instead of Build-Essental: yes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
619700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619700
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.29
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Hi,

This bug is related to the mail at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/03/msg00978.html
which discusses the existance of both the build-essential package and
the field.  Quick summary: we think that in the longer term (i.e. after
squeeze is dropped from the main archive at the ends of its security
support) the field should go and the package should be the definition
(it already is de-facto for most things including cdebootstrap).

On Sat, 26, Mar, 2011 at 10:53:07AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert spoke thus..
> As far as we know currently the main user of this field seems to be
> debootstrap in its buildd variant mode.

I just went and checked that changing to using the package wouldn't make
any difference (trivial patch at
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/mhy/debootstrap.git;a=commitdiff;h=782b75f69f383e4d0e6f8909c9a69844c9f769af
)

Using lenny squeeze wheezy and sid, I found no differences to dpkg
--get-selections (on amd64) before and after the above patch (using
debootstrap --variant=buildd ${d} ${d} http://mirror/debian/
)

Thanks,

Mark

-- 
Mark Hymers <mhy at debian dot org>

"But Yossarian *still* didn't understand either how Milo could buy eggs
 in Malta for seven cents apiece and sell them at a profit in Pianosa
 for five cents."
     Catch 22, Joseph Heller

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: debootstrap
Source-Version: 1.0.31

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debootstrap-udeb_1.0.31_all.udeb
  to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.31_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.31.dsc
  to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.31.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.31.tar.gz
  to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.31.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.31_all.deb
  to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.31_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 619700@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> (supplier of updated debootstrap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:45:48 +0100
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description: 
 debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian system
 debootstrap-udeb - Bootstrap the Debian system (udeb)
Closes: 619700
Changes: 
 debootstrap (1.0.31) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Mark Hymers ]
   * Don't use the Build-Essential: yes field in Debian, use the
     build-essential package. Closes: #619700.
 .
   [ Colin Watson ]
   * If ubuntu-keyring is installed, check Release signatures against it when
     bootstrapping Ubuntu gutsy and later.
   * Recommend ubuntu-keyring rather than debian-archive-keyring on
     Ubuntu-derived systems.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8a07c74cd98e0cc11208857c485b22fe7023c4fb 1748 debootstrap_1.0.31.dsc
 71a0f55a73a26288f910715f0b4f50986bd2ba77 54934 debootstrap_1.0.31.tar.gz
 52190069f778957763a64ffabb0a7a1c75a7ac69 57290 debootstrap_1.0.31_all.deb
 b7b13163d21015be28791efa8699772c4c043458 18764 debootstrap-udeb_1.0.31_all.udeb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 2eeb5d1ced385fb7f2205ca484d13c25c61243be9382c875e99c47afb21bb04e 1748 debootstrap_1.0.31.dsc
 c023674e0b44731c9f1dead97aca1e972865a76df3545da6fdc78d90fe299b0e 54934 debootstrap_1.0.31.tar.gz
 8f168232d3814bc1406b6a17c46b685ce5c7735ef9695cafbe74c96820e51f9b 57290 debootstrap_1.0.31_all.deb
 31bcfd668bd1b2390a1eae1d8ee5c405a4e541287a06061cadb595977a9593a3 18764 debootstrap-udeb_1.0.31_all.udeb
Files: 
 327ac79c6d458eb0fb370226be15fe72 1748 admin extra debootstrap_1.0.31.dsc
 6a5f386b21fa567dfbb0c489eb5af2d3 54934 admin extra debootstrap_1.0.31.tar.gz
 8f1105663e56da88105649b25e331154 57290 admin extra debootstrap_1.0.31_all.deb
 7f82c7fdb96791e137b1f3020f022afa 18764 debian-installer extra debootstrap-udeb_1.0.31_all.udeb
Package-Type: udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -- Debian developer

iQIVAwUBTdYrADk1h9l9hlALAQiKqA//TU1LlsLT8xMwNLDr6t4mETf8SuhAUCd8
uKCJODMAOzDuIrNxFkc6MgiDF/9r2+Tfb8xjvdKWLZDxV+mxCbNfo/lrtypiabN2
z70v1LxS5svVe3Y6UQEc1moWF4ib8fxg+LyXkgRSaABG5LeFwqzyKtekgGmA2EbM
xVC3D8VplLauZE0zgfvJpuyycT9ATNh0wwQ/gtXJeW/Q9RPJXMv+Meyrysbqmkq8
mI8HRBAsh6JfDK5LfYsVb/qoyNr6Yy3XaScffvmCGS7p+NwugXjf+z4OF/2SLYTF
6jmuLfb/57QYHX8sVpAAg24i2k7sM1PThg4RPnYSuIK1H6b+dNcSyA3lWpCpHHeL
iXsXsu+4jaCzvzOvw0iMNH6MlgvMfIZqxVOU2zSip0K/j4aTgvCh/flQR7DaLMrV
qqI8DFMJHCEOVozAFn3yhNNL2JA7clGQJaypIOqLYs5hA/NLvZWb0NEnUfjoIB7D
Veel7cyxpJjVuLkYJP6hNchWJkcIophiuuEWGnGe2zTygdjiTOj7FrUk7NQx51Vn
Mi4KJN6/eCT2wtp6zJM4Ugnt5Avdf6lAIEMcR0Pau2NYy2HSmrFbTxZdnpzUqNqc
/6Aj4b9rDIbDHhWVS1qDsHqn1PRgN/2VPFA68OXxlEt4Dy6KiiOVvuLbzQjcnvFw
TspEpqmQuIA=
=nF3J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: