[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#603925: marked as done (Sparc installation results for debian 6.0 b1)

Your message dated Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:40:01 +0100
with message-id <20101118174001.GW3765@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#603925: Sparc installation results for debian 6.0 b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #603925,
regarding Sparc installation results for debian 6.0 b1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
603925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603925
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: <How did you boot the installer? CD? floppy? network?> NETWORK
Image version: <Full URL to image you downloaded is best>debian-squeeze-di-beta1-sparc-netinst.iso
Date: <Date and time of the install> 11-17-2010

Machine: <Description of machine (eg, IBM Thinkpad R32)> SUN ULTRA 60
Processor:450 mhz X 2
Memory:1.6gb
Partitions: <df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred> default all in one partition (no lvm)
           on 18.2 gb scsi hard drive

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:           [0 ]
Detect network card:    [0 ]
Configure network:      [0 ]
Detect CD:              [0 ]
Load installer modules: [0 ]
Detect hard drives:     [0 ]
Partition hard drives:  [0 ]
Install base system:    [0 ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [0 ]
User/password setup:    [0 ]
Install tasks:          [0 ]
Install boot loader:    [0 ]
Overall install:        [E ]

Comments/Problems: 
1. Initial reboot succeeded.
2. User Login Ok, system came up and discovered the following:
         a. Printer configuration came up but locked up every time initiated.
         b. Flash on Ice weasel still not working (doesn't work on 5.0.6 either)
         c. Epiphany starts to load but drops out as soon as it tries to load a html.
3. shut system down and brought back up from total shutdown and the following was observed:
         a. User login ok.
         b. After login gnome imediatley tries to open file-browser, over and over again. I could not 
            count how many it was opening but it would not stop. This made the software completely unusable.
         c. Had to go into shut down, which did work and did shutdown. I didn't find any other way of stopping it.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Quoting Steven Terwilliger (stevespda2@live.com):

> 1. Initial reboot succeeded.
> 2. User Login Ok, system came up and discovered the following:
>          a. Printer configuration came up but locked up every time initiated.
>          b. Flash on Ice weasel still not working (doesn't work on 5.0.6 either)
>          c. Epiphany starts to load but drops out as soon as it tries to load a html.
> 3. shut system down and brought back up from total shutdown and the following was observed:
>          a. User login ok.
>          b. After login gnome imediatley tries to open file-browser, over and over again. I could not 
>             count how many it was opening but it would not stop. This made the software completely unusable.
>          c. Had to go into shut down, which did work and did shutdown. I didn't find any other way of stopping it.

Thanks for your report.

As these issues are really not related to the installer, I think it's
much better now to eventually report bugs against the relevant
packages. The installation itself seems to be fine.

Thanks for your help testing the installer.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: