Hi, On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 12:35:28AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > I noticed these warnings in the PTS page for partman-zfs: > > # partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 8.1-4) > # partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > > Does this mean the Architecture field in partman-zfs should > be moved from "all" to "kfreebsd-any" ? britney does check arch:all instability only on i386, I'm afraid. > I intentionally used "all" because partman-ufs (which is > kfreebsd-specific) is set to "all" too, and so are the rest > of filesystems, most of which are linux-specific. partman-ufs's deps *are* satisfied on i386, due to ufs-modules being available. > No problem on my side with changing it, but I had this > feeling that making a script happy is the wrong reason. > I.e. if the reason is valid for partman-zfs, I guess it'd be > valid for partman-ufs and the rest. No, because partman-ufs is indeed also working on Linux. Now you could, of course, argue that this might not be true for the hurd or another new kernel, but that's a thing we are ignoring in many more places at this point (i.e. Linux is still "special", and will be for quite some time). Kind regards, Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature