Quoting Joey Hess (email@example.com): > Christian PERRIER wrote: > > On the other hand, I think that other daily builds done in Joey Hess' > > home are very safe. Obviously, Joey has proven over years how reliable > > he can be and I don't see urgency to change this. > > Aside from not being in the building where that box is all the time, and > it not coming back up automatically after power failures, and little issues > like that. > > I'd prefer if armel builds were moved to the buildds. OK. Otavio ack'ed my suggestion yesterday on IRC and mentioned he would reping RM's about this (I'm not sure I understand why RM have to be involved for moving D-I builds but there's certainly a reason..:-)) What I would also like to have is a way to easily *monitor* these daily builds. I'd be fine to do it myself on a regular basis if there's a way to get these status by mail (offline work most of the time during weeks). This is what I do with builds that are run on my own laptop, which already helps in catching build failures that happen on all arches (or on i386 only).
Description: Digital signature