Re: Installer Translation Status
On Monday 19 July 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>
wrote:
> > The packages I released were tagged with the attached script,
> > contributed by Joey back in.....a long time ago..:-)
> >
> > Apparently, it does strip the epoch when calculating the tag. I guess
> > this was on purpose.
>
> Yes but it breaks calc-translation-status and also conflicts with
> debcommit behaviour; I think we need to "decide" which one is to be
> the used format (with or without epoch). In my opinion debcommit
> behaviour looks right and we ought to use epoch specially because we
> can end up with same version in two different epochs without it.
Basing on debcommit seems the only correct option to me. Possibly a
fallback to stripped epoch could be used to cover current cases.
Reply to: