Frans Pop <email@example.com> (23/03/2010): > Please note that I have not promoted the lintian warning as I'm well > aware of the background of this. From Cyril's PoV the lintian > warning may have seemed logical, And practical, since it makes sure we don't actually add some unneeded stuff in the udebs, where size is oh-so-critical, as you requested. > but I agree that the real issue is in dpkg which in the view of the > D-I team should not include the field in the control file in > packages, at least not for udebs. Also, I'm not interested in -boot vs. -dpkg endless debates. > See my mail in reply to Cyril's proposal of the patch: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/03/msg00190.html I pointed Raphael to that reply earlier today. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature