[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: (Temptative) list of udebs for X11-based d-i

(I failed to include pkg-gnome in my first mail, I've bounced it
anyway; adding them for real now. Adding pkg-sdl as well.)

Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> (19/03/2010):
> > | libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb
> This package should be dropped now. Hasn't that been done yet? I'd
> consider migrating gtk+2.0 without dropping that package first an RC
> bug.

Gnome folks were discussing it this very afternoon, and I think they
agreed to drop it. Would it seem acceptable to force the current
package as is, and then fix this right afterward?

> > | libsdl1.2debian-udeb
> IMO this needs to be fixed by compiling it against X.org instead of
> directfb before anything migrates. As we've never actually used the
> libsdl udeb (it was intended to support games), it could also simply
> be dropped.

Since I really would like to get stuff migrated ASAP (I would hate
blocking anyone), I think we should go for either breaking or dropping
it for now. Getting it built against X.org can be done afterward.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: