Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> writes:
> On Monday 22 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
>> This is brilliant. You've just seriously broken installations in
>> unstable.
>>
>> On Monday 22 February 2010, Archive Administrator wrote:
>> > netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
>>
>> This should *never* have been uploaded before a new busybox, because the
>> busybox dhcp client does not work with the current version.
>
> I've added a workaround for this by temporarily including dhcp3-client-udeb
> in all images.
I noticed; thanks for that.
>> > base-installer_1.105_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
>>
>> This included a very clear instruction in the changelog:
>> * Drop install_filesystems step as that is now being taken care of by
>> post-base-installer.d hook scripts.
>> ! Requires: partman-base (138), partman-md (50), partman-lvm (69),
>> ! partman-crypto (41).
>
> I'll upload these packages, as well as live-installer.
> I'd have liked to do some additional testing first, but well.
Right. Thanks by taking care of those uploaded.
Cheers,
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: CDFC6E4F
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: