[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes

On Monday 22 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> This is brilliant. You've just seriously broken installations in
> unstable.
> On Monday 22 February 2010, Archive Administrator wrote:
> > netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
> This should *never* have been uploaded before a new busybox, because the
> busybox dhcp client does not work with the current version.

I've added a workaround for this by temporarily including dhcp3-client-udeb 
in all images.

> > base-installer_1.105_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
> This included a very clear instruction in the changelog:
>   * Drop install_filesystems step as that is now being taken care of by
>     post-base-installer.d hook scripts.
> !   Requires: partman-base (138), partman-md (50), partman-lvm (69),
> !   partman-crypto (41).

I'll upload these packages, as well as live-installer.
I'd have liked to do some additional testing first, but well.

Reply to: