Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes
On Monday 22 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> This is brilliant. You've just seriously broken installations in
> On Monday 22 February 2010, Archive Administrator wrote:
> > netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
> This should *never* have been uploaded before a new busybox, because the
> busybox dhcp client does not work with the current version.
I've added a workaround for this by temporarily including dhcp3-client-udeb
in all images.
> > base-installer_1.105_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
> This included a very clear instruction in the changelog:
> * Drop install_filesystems step as that is now being taken care of by
> post-base-installer.d hook scripts.
> ! Requires: partman-base (138), partman-md (50), partman-lvm (69),
> ! partman-crypto (41).
I'll upload these packages, as well as live-installer.
I'd have liked to do some additional testing first, but well.