[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Switching g-i from DirectFB to X11

Anton Zinoviev, le Tue 16 Feb 2010 23:58:06 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:03:45AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > 
> > There are general considerations about the user interface that were
> > collected by Frans and reported to the archive. The concerns were also
> > about size issues (because of l10n as there are a huge amount of
> > strings that are potentially translatable).
> The only remaining problem that has to be fixed is in xkb-data - for 
> many layouts an US variant must be added so the users get it as option 
> in the first question.

Some time ago, I had reported
Bug 21046 – express that the us layout makes the majority in a bunch of countries

Is that what you have in mind?

It ended up with a question from Sergey about how to fix the layout
names.  I was unsure how to answer it so I left it apart. Maybe
Christian has an idea?

> All other problems are either fixed or too difficult to fix.

Do you have a list of the too difficult ones?

> However, if d-i switches again to c-s, then c-s will require an active 
> maintainer who belongs to the d-i team, because I can not fix bugs 
> specific for the udebs or their interraction with the rest of the installer.

I could handle that.


Reply to: