Re: Switching g-i from DirectFB to X11
Anton Zinoviev, le Tue 16 Feb 2010 23:58:06 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:03:45AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > There are general considerations about the user interface that were
> > collected by Frans and reported to the archive. The concerns were also
> > about size issues (because of l10n as there are a huge amount of
> > strings that are potentially translatable).
> The only remaining problem that has to be fixed is in xkb-data - for
> many layouts an US variant must be added so the users get it as option
> in the first question.
Some time ago, I had reported
Bug 21046 – express that the us layout makes the majority in a bunch of countries
Is that what you have in mind?
It ended up with a question from Sergey about how to fix the layout
names. I was unsure how to answer it so I left it apart. Maybe
Christian has an idea?
> All other problems are either fixed or too difficult to fix.
Do you have a list of the too difficult ones?
> However, if d-i switches again to c-s, then c-s will require an active
> maintainer who belongs to the d-i team, because I can not fix bugs
> specific for the udebs or their interraction with the rest of the installer.
I could handle that.