Bug#548128: Similar Problem
On Friday 11 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> And that looks to be the issue described in this bug report:
I've just done some debugging in rdate of this problem, and it looks to be
a calculation bug in rdate (either due to incorrect handling of overflow
or maybe endianness). See the BR linked above for details.
On Friday 11 December 2009, Joey Hess wrote:
> Why isn't base-installer's setting of --ignore-time-conflict avoiding
> this problem?
No idea. But I'll let someone else look into that aspect.