Re: [PATCH] Basic Openmoko GTA02 support
* Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org> [2009-07-29 17:45]:
> The most important thing is that we can all agree on the same name.
> Which one we actually choose does not matter that much for me. I would prefer
> s3c24xx, though, as I've mostly settled for this name now for the things
> I've done in during the last days. Is there any opposition against this
> name?
It's fine with me. I don't think it makes a big difference whether
it's s3c24xx or s3c... just pick one and stick to it. :)
> > I think it's fine to apply patches for e.g. libdebian-installer,
> > base-installer, flash-kernel, etc; but you obviously cannot change
> > linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6 and the d-i build system before we have a
> > kernel in the archive.
>
> Is there no way we can commit the patches to the build system but not
> activate it for Debian builds?
Yeah, you can do that.
Anyway, please post your new patches to the list for review first.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Reply to: