Re: [PATCH] Basic Openmoko GTA02 support
* Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org> [2009-07-26 20:35]:
> I agree about the name change. We want to use the same name the
> Debian kernel package will use for the architecture. I propose to name
> it s3c24xx, are you fine with that name?
I guess either s3c24xx or (possibly) s3c should work. Vince knows a
lot about Samsung CPUs so I suggest you ask him.
> Do you think that we have to wait committing anything until we have
> a kernel in the archive? Until we don't switch to a VCS which
> supports easy local branching and shareing of these branches (hint,
> hint git...) this would be a major pain in the ass. So I hope the
> d-i team allows us to commit our work as soon as the basic nameing
> is sorted out and the patches are sane.
I think it's fine to apply patches for e.g. libdebian-installer,
base-installer, flash-kernel, etc; but you obviously cannot change
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6 and the d-i build system before we have a
kernel in the archive.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Reply to: