Re: wpasupplicant for all wireless ops? (was: Re: [Netcfg-Add-WPA-Support 0/3])
On Tuesday 14 April 2009, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> * NetworkManager is used on most distros (and Debian as well) for
> desktop installations. NetworkManager always use wpasupplicant for
> interaction with wireless networks so now both wpasupplicant and the
> drivers have been quite tested.
> Getting rid of our custom code dealing with the wireless sounds to
> favor more commonly used software sounds like a desirable goal to me.
> What do other thinks?
As long as networkmanager does not become a requirement. Installing a
system using wireless should result in working networking both with and
without networkmanager installed in the target system.