On Thursday 24 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Wouldn't be better to change the binaries names? It would follow other > architecture specific modules that doesn't include the archname on the > binary name package. I see no reason to override the decision of Bastian to use those names. Especially for netdevice it could be argued that the package name would be too generic without the s390- prefix.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.