On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Colin Watson wrote: > I've fixed the second one to use &releasename;. However, the central > entity definitions for the manual still have the release name set to > "etch". Frans (or anyone), do you know if this is intentional? Yes, it was to allow us to update the manual for Etch (see r45965/r45966), but that option has since been abandoned. I've just re-committed that change for common.ent.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.