Quoting Frans Pop (firstname.lastname@example.org): > On Friday 07 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote: > > I cleaned that up - most of was came in due copy paste from other places > > in the file. Thanks again for the comments, a new version is attached. > > Looks fine to me. > > I'm not sure that I agree with Christian  about expanding WWID. I would > say that people using multipath will already know what it is (even if they > don't know what the acronym stands for), and to be honest I find "WorldWide > IDentifier" both rather pretentious and just as meaningless as WWID. I don't exactly agree about "meaningless". Knowing that WWID means "WorldWide IDentifier" helped me to understand that this seems to be a generic way to name a multipath device, so expanding the acronym has at least some teaching benefit. Of course, having this earlier would be much much better, of course.
Description: Digital signature