Frans Pop wrote:
> This is a nice patch for discussion, but IMO it does not have the
> quality we normally strife for in the installer.
So, I clearly made two mistakes here:
1. Not making it really clear this was more of a "brain dump" to try
and find problems with the idea than SVN-ready code.
2. Adding the 'patch' tag dispite (1).
I'll be more careful in future.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK chris@chris-lamb.co.uk
GPG: 0x634F9A20
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature