Frans Pop wrote: > This is a nice patch for discussion, but IMO it does not have the > quality we normally strife for in the installer. So, I clearly made two mistakes here: 1. Not making it really clear this was more of a "brain dump" to try and find problems with the idea than SVN-ready code. 2. Adding the 'patch' tag dispite (1). I'll be more careful in future. Regards, -- Chris Lamb, UK chris@chris-lamb.co.uk GPG: 0x634F9A20
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature