On Monday 11 February 2008, Joey Hess wrote: > Since splitting udebs differently than the debs are split is a special > case that seems likely to affect other libraries than glibc, I'd prefer > to keep the special case in glibc, rather than in dehelper. s/likely/unlikely/ I guess. Yes, I thought as much. > BTW, has anyone looked at how library symbols files interact with udeb: > lines in shlibs files? The symbols file tend to override the shlibs > files, and I wonder if this won't result in bad dependencies in udebs as > the libraries they depend on are converted to have symbols files. I haven't and doubt anyone else has. As this seems to be my area now, I'll contact the initiators of that scheme. Cheers, FJP
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.