On Thursday 10 January 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: > I'm even tempted to remove the atomic update feature that runs "svn > up" before each change to a file. Yes, agreed. I wasn't sure about it so I left it alone. Would you mind if I completely revamped logging? The aim would be to: - by default have full logging to a file (including output of gettext and svn commands) - show errors in both log file and on stdout - optionally show progress on stdout - option to not use a log file but output everything to stdout
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.