On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:52:18PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > One thing that is not completely nice is that bootstrap-base now > > installs a file in /usr/lib/debootstrap/. I thought about putting it > > elsewhere, but think the current location is defensible as well with > > the rationale that it provides a missing component of debootstrap. > > It's a minor layering violation, but I think it's OK here. Perhaps add a > comment to debootstrap that the pkgdetails API needs to be kept in sync > with base-installer, so that we don't forget in future. Comment added. > > > except I'd do it by adding: > > > elif type udpkg >/dev/null 2>&1 && udpkg --print-architecture > > > > > > >/dev/null 2>&1; then ARCH=`udpkg --print-architecture` > > > > > > ... to debootstrap rather than passing the architecture in from > > > base-installer. > > > > Hmmm. Why? > > Regularity: debootstrap already does the same thing with dpkg. OK. Done.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.