Bug#412922: please generate win32-loader.ini "manifest" file
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:44:10AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > if the CD is
> > inserted, _increases_ our "responsibility" if the user should fail to
> > read (or probably more importantly: understand) any of the warnings
> > about "erasing your harddisk and losing existing data".
> > The fact that actually starting an install stills involve a reboot, is not
> > a real safeguard as installing almost anything interesting on Windows
> > requires a reboot anyway.
> > The fact that currently the installer needs to be booted completely
> > separately, at least makes absolutely clear to even the most clueless
> > Windows user that Debian is not some Windows proggie that can "just be
> > tried" (as running random Windows proggies is of course always "safe",
> > right?).
> > I could probably be convinced to include this on CD images if the patch
> > would not start your loader, but would open a modified README.html that
> > has an extensive explanation of what Debian is and only contains a link
> > to the loader itself.
> > This would however increase the need for translation of the README.html
> > (which is a worthwhile goal for debian-cd anyway).
> > The same would go for USB keystick, but I am not sure if this should be
> > included in other installation methods.
> I agree that these concerns are important. Perhaps a good solution would be
> to add enormous warnings (maybe even interactive warnings similar to the
> well-known "Yes, do as I say!").
> Anyway, at the moment I'm not yet proposing to put this in the default CD,
> just to make it easy for users to build their custom CDs with win32-loader
> (which is currently awkward since you have to know win32-loader.ini format
> spec). I think for the kind of user who builds her own CD, it's safe to
> assume when this CD is used in a Windows box, someone who is not completely
> clueless about what an OS is will be around.
So, is win32-loader.ini generation (alone, without generating autorun.inf!)
ok at this point ?
We can talk about autorun.inf later if you like.
My spam trap is firstname.lastname@example.org. Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.