[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#418124: marked as done (debian-installer: Does not recognise pre-existing LVM LVs)



Your message dated Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:16:15 +1100
with message-id <200704091216.19383.russell@coker.com.au>
and subject line Bug#418124: debian-installer: Does not recognise pre-existing LVM LVs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Version: RC2
Severity: normal

http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc2/i386/iso-cd/
I downloaded the netinst CD this morning from the above URL.

I was upgrading a Fedora machine to Debian and I wanted to use the same LVs.
The root and swap LVs had the same size requirements and /boot was right,
so all that should have been needed was to run mkfs and mkswap.

However d-i didn't recognise the "root" and "swap" LVs, I had to go to the
LVM configuration, delete them, and then create new LVs (of the same size and
name) before I could do the install I desired.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-xen-686
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Saturday 07 April 2007 18:24, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 01:03:52PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > However d-i didn't recognise the "root" and "swap" LVs, I had to go to
> > the LVM configuration, delete them, and then create new LVs (of the same
> > size and name) before I could do the install I desired.
>
> Are you sure? IME, going to the LVM menu and leaving it is enough to
> kick off vgscan.

I tested it again and it did just that.

I can't be sure if it's some strange bug that is difficult to reproduce or 
whether I just stuffed up, so I'm closing the bug.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: