Re: (d-i) download improvements

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: (d-i) download improvements
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:09:10 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200703052309.27910.elendil@planet.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070305214034.GN26920@gpm.stappers.nl>
References: <[🔎] None.LNX.4.64.0703042037010.23406@cantor.unex.es> <[🔎] CBEGLCFKGFBHNOLMKIMHEEPOCOAA.plugwash@p10link.net> <[🔎] 20070305214034.GN26920@gpm.stappers.nl>

On Monday 05 March 2007 22:40, Geert Stappers wrote:
> My advice is to split them in separate wishlist bugreports against
> the (pseudo)package[1] ftp.debian.org

Please don't. This has _nothing_ to do with ftp.debian.org!

Attachment: pgp8Cn_rH827F.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Etch netinstaller has no eth0 in qemu
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- RE: Etch netinstaller has no eth0 in qemu
  - From: "peter green" <plugwash@P10Link.net>
- Re: (d-i) download improvements
  - From: stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers)

Prev by Date: Re: (d-i) download improvements
Next by Date: RE: (d-i) download improvements
Previous by thread: Re: (d-i) download improvements
Next by thread: RE: (d-i) download improvements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread