Your message dated Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:53:12 -0500 with message-id <20070219225312.GD29081@kitenet.net> and subject line Bug#407063: wine in desktop task? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: wine in desktop task?
- From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:14:11 +0100
- Message-id: <20070115231411.GA6358@aragorn>
Package: tasksel Version: 2.58 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch How about adding wine to desktop task? --- tasksel-2.63/tasks/desktop~ 2007-01-12 23:19:19.000000000 +0100 +++ tasksel-2.63/tasks/desktop 2007-01-16 00:10:54.000000000 +0100 @@ -65,3 +65,7 @@ cupsys-bsd # gui for configuration of the print server foomatic-gui + wine + wine-utils + libwine-print + libwine-gl -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-amd64 Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages tasksel depends on: ii aptitude 0.4.4-1 terminal-based apt frontend ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy ii liblocale-gettext-perl 1.05-1 Using libc functions for internati ii tasksel-data 2.58 Official tasks used for installati tasksel recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 407063-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#407063: wine in desktop task?
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:53:12 -0500
- Message-id: <20070219225312.GD29081@kitenet.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070219223517.GA17900@aragorn>
- References: <20070115231411.GA6358@aragorn> <20070116041807.GA747@kitenet.net> <20070117094215.GA32691@aragorn> <None.LNX.4.64.0701171106140.12486@cantor.unex.es> <20070117200133.GA16354@aragorn> <20070117211014.GA3976@tiger> <[🔎] 20070219204303.GA7839@aragorn> <[🔎] 45DA0F7C.8010201@dsv.su.se> <[🔎] 20070219223517.GA17900@aragorn>
Robert Millan wrote: > Yes, but it is not *our* problem. > > "We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software community. > We will place their interests first in our priorities." FWIW, when people start quoting the DFSG at me, especially this sentence, I generally go find something more productive to do than participate in the discussion futher. It's the best way to live up to that section of the DFSG. :-P -- see shy joAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---