On Sunday 28 January 2007 20:51, Joey Hess wrote: > Changes in d-i for this will mostly be limited to adding "armel" after > "arm" in the architecture lists. I think that such changes, and other > trivial uses of the armel name could be committed now as they're found. > Anyone against that? I have no objection as long as this does not get translated to a promise to do so before Etch. IMO delaying this until after RC2 (as tbm has just replied to the BR) makes more sense. The last set of uploads for RC2 will probably start sometime this coming week after all.
Description: PGP signature