Bug#407681: marked as done (Installation report)
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:51:02 +0100
with message-id <200701201451.03414.elendil@planet.nl>
and subject line Bug#407681: Installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Official CD
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r4/i386/bt-cd/debian-31r4-i386-binary-1.iso.torrent
Date: 22nd of November 2006
Machine: Home built PC/server
Processor: Pentium2 400MHz
Memory: 128MB DIMM
Partitions:
Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 ext3 10240 2969 7270 29% /boot
/dev/hda2 ext3 628873216 264126750 364746465 42% /
Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot: [O]
Detect network card: [O]
Configure network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Clock/timezone setup: [O]
User/password setup: [O]
Install tasks: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Overall install: [O]
Comments/Problems:
Everything worked fine. No problems, not in the installation process, not in the server programs installing processes. We used a 2.6 kernel and installed XFCE as desktop manager.
--
Saunalahti Iso G - 50 Gigatavua nopeaa ja varmennettua verkkolevyä tiedostoillesi. Kokeile ilmaiseksi!
http://isog.pp.fi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Saturday 20 January 2007 14:24, timo.ahomaa@netti.fi wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Everything worked fine. No problems, not in the installation process,
> not in the server programs installing processes. We used a 2.6 kernel
> and installed XFCE as desktop manager.
Good to hear. Thanks you for submitting your report. I'm closing it as
there were no issues. Good luck with your new system.
Cheers,
FJP
--- End Message ---
Reply to: