Bug#397973: Processed: upping severity, as discussed with Steve ...
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 12:25, you wrote:
> Separately, I feel that md support is important enough to enough users
> that I would not be comfortable releasing an installer with etch that
> couldn't handle software raid at install time; I imagine you would
> agree that if this happened to the installer as a whole, it would be an
> unacceptable regression against sarge and therefore unreleasable. I
> think for the same reason that we shouldn't be too hasty to release
> with md support broken on one of our release archs.
But AFAIK it is _not_ a regression.