[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#405496: installation-report: successful installation on a rather old Pentium-MMX box



Package: installation-report
Severity: wishlist


Boot method: multi-arch netinst CD (as of 2006-12-28)
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-testing-MULTI-NETINST-1.iso 
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:50:33 +0100

Machine: assembled box
  CPU: Pentium-MMX  Clock frequency: 200 MHz
  RAM capacity: 64 Mibyte  HD capacity: about 4.3 Gbyte
  Please see the attached hardware summary for further details
         
Partitions:
(the raw partition table, as written by cfdisk, is attached)
# df -Tl
Filesystem    Type   1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/notsooldbox-root
              ext3     1318312    250080   1001264  20% /
tmpfs        tmpfs       31108         0     31108   0% /lib/init/rw
udev         tmpfs       10240        56     10184   1% /dev
tmpfs        tmpfs       31108         0     31108   0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda1     ext3      241116     13326    215342   6% /boot
/dev/mapper/notsooldbox-home
              ext3     2439120     69256   2245960   3% /home


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:           [O]
Detect network card:    [ ]
Configure network:      [ ]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:    [O]
Install tasks:          [ ]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Overall install:        [O]

Comments/Problems:

No problems AFAICS.
Note that I tested the guided partitioning of the entire disk with
encrypted LVM (choosing to separate /home): it seems to work fine.
Also note that I only installed the base system, without selecting
any task.

Attachment: hardware-summary.gz
Description: Binary data

Attachment: raw-part-table.gz
Description: Binary data


Reply to: