On Thursday 21 December 2006 12:01, Steve Langasek wrote: > Yes, TTBOMK these packages could be binNMUed for a *silent* ABI change. > For an ABI change expressed in the package name, they would all need > sourceful uploads. For d-i release management I'd actually prefer an ABI change for loop-aes as otherwise we would possibly get failed installations during the transition period and run the risk of forgetting to update the loop-aes udebs.
Attachment:
pgpnDhrGtpEvi.pgp
Description: PGP signature