Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.
- To: David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu>
- Cc: Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org>, Harald Staub <staub@switch.ch>, 401393@bugs.debian.org, 392623@bugs.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:31:14 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20061208093114.GA25199@bee.dooz.org>
- Mail-followup-to: David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu>, Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org>, Harald Staub <staub@switch.ch>, 401393@bugs.debian.org, 392623@bugs.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 33883.145.64.134.242.1165569052.squirrel@www.hardeman.nu>
- References: <457675BA.8040707@switch.ch> <20061203042259.GA9887@jeeves.burrows.local> <20061206121627.GA20451@bee.dooz.org> <4577BCE9.4090105@switch.ch> <20061207083333.GB18852@bee.dooz.org> <[🔎] 20061208031241.GA10141@jeeves.burrows.local> <[🔎] 33883.145.64.134.242.1165569052.squirrel@www.hardeman.nu>
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006, David Härdeman wrote:
> Don't mix up boot-on-raid and boot-on-device-mapper, they are two
> different things using different kernel subsystems (md and dm).
Err, md is dm based, right? You mean boot on LVM versus boot on MD?
Or did you mean dmraid which is yet something else?
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
"I have no strong feelings one way or the other." -- Neutral President
Reply to: